Key result
Implementation of best practice for discharge planning in acute coronary syndrome patients improved compliance rates for four key criteria from 38% to 100%.
Why the study?
Does the implementation of a best practice project improve compliance with discharge planning criteria for acute coronary syndrome patients?
Does the implementation of a best practice project improve compliance with discharge planning criteria for acute coronary syndrome patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 38%
Implementation of a structured audit and feedback project significantly improved compliance with evidence-based discharge planning for ACS patients.
Supports local adoption of structured ACS discharge planning; leaves open translation to clinical outcomes in other settings.
Background Acute coronary syndromes threaten the lives of patients, and pose a high risk for morbidity and mortality despite advances in treatment. Evidence highlights that effective discharge planning is associated with long-term prognosis of patients. Objectives The aim of this project was to improve local practice in discharge planning for acute coronary syndrome patients in Huadong Hospital, Shanghai. Methods Five criteria identified by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) were used to conduct an audit in the Cardiovascular Ward and Coronary Care Unit of Huadong Hospital, Shanghai. Forty-two nurses and 65 patients were involved. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI-PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRIP) audit tools for promoting change in health practice were used to ascertain compliance with the criteria before and after the implementation of best practice. The program included three phases and was conducted over five months. Results The project showed that the compliance rates of in-house education, advice on lifestyle changes, education on discharge medication and left ventricular assessment reached 100%. Psychological screening also attained 97% compliance. There were improvements in the compliance rates of four criteria from 38% to 100%, excluding inhouse education which was already 100% compliant. Conclusions The project achieved significant improvements in establishing evidence-based practice of discharge planning for acute coronary syndrome patients in the Cardiovascular Ward and Coronary Care Unit. Strategies for sustaining best practice will continue to be developed in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lü et al. (2015) studied Acute coronary syndrome (n=107). Best practice implementation for discharge planning vs. Baseline practice was evaluated on Compliance with JBI criteria for discharge planning. Implementation of best practice for discharge planning in acute coronary syndrome patients improved compliance rates for four key criteria from 38% to 100%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: