Key result
Among ACS patients treated with a stent and clopidogrel, a subsequent ischemic event was associated with $32,495 higher medical costs over 2 years and $39,742 higher costs over 3 years.
Why the study?
What are the healthcare costs associated with a subsequent ischemic event in ACS patients treated with a stent and clopidogrel?
Cohort (n=9,135)
Yes
What are the healthcare costs associated with a subsequent ischemic event in ACS patients treated with a stent and clopidogrel?
Effect estimate: $32,495 more over 2 years and $39,742 more over 3 years
Subsequent ischemic events in ACS patients treated with stenting and clopidogrel are associated with substantial increases in long-term healthcare costs.
Recurrent ischemic events drive major added costs in stented ACS; extends economic burden data but leaves open effects of preventive strategies.
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective claims study was performed to evaluate the initial and subsequent healthcare costs in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who had been treated with stent placement and clopidogrel following discharge from the hospital. METHOD AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective, administrative claims-based analysis from a large, geographically diverse US managed care plan affiliated with i3 Innovus. Study subjects were commercially insured enrollees, aged > or = 18, who were hospitalized for ACS between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2004 with a stent placed, and had at least one filled prescription for clopidogrel within 7 days of discharge from the index hospitalization. Of the 9135 subjects included in the cost analysis, 2241 subjects experienced a subsequent event. On average, subjects with a second event incurred $32,495 more in medical costs over 2 years and $39,742 more in medical costs over 3 years versus those who did not have a second event. Excluding ischemic hospitalizations, subjects with a second event incurred $7257 and $9724 more in medical costs than patients without a second event during the 2 and 3 years following discharge from the index hospitalization, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant cost increases were observed among patients who had a subsequent hospitalization for an ischemic event compared to those without a subsequent hospitalization. Cost increases were still present after excluding costs of the ischemic hospitalizations. The findings of this study must be considered within the limitations of database analysis as claims data are collected for the purpose of payment and not research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chastek et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=9,135). Subsequent ischemic event vs. No subsequent ischemic event was evaluated on Medical costs over 2 and 3 years ($32,495 more over 2 years and $39,742 more over 3 years). Among ACS patients treated with a stent and clopidogrel, a subsequent ischemic event was associated with $32,495 higher medical costs over 2 years and $39,742 higher costs over 3 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: