Key result
A small gastric pouch during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass significantly increased the odds of complete type 2 diabetes remission at 6 years (OR 1.11) compared to a large gastric pouch in patients with a BMI < 35 kg/m2.
Why the study?
The effect of gastric pouch size during RYGB is unclear with contradictory results, and long-term data in type 2 diabetes patients with low BMI are sparse.
Does Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a small gastric pouch improve weight loss and glycemic control compared to a large gastric pouch in Chinese patients with T2D and BMI < 35 kg/m2?
Cohort (n=95)
No
Does Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a small gastric pouch improve weight loss and glycemic control compared to a large gastric pouch in Chinese patients with T2D and BMI < 35 kg/m2?
Odds Ratio: 1.11 (95% CI 1.07–1.16)
Absolute Event Rate: 46.8% vs 23.7%
p-value: p=0.01
In patients with T2D and BMI < 35 kg/m2, RYGB with a small gastric pouch provides superior long-term weight loss and glycemic control compared to a large pouch, with a lower risk of marginal ulcers.
Small-pouch RYGB was associated with superior 6-year glycemic control and remission in low-BMI T2D; leaves open need for RCTs before changing surgical standards.
Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) results in extraordinary weight loss and glycemic control outcomes for patients with obesity; however, the effect of gastric pouch size is still unclear, and the reported results are contradictory. Additionally, long-term data on type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with low body mass index (BMI) are sparse. This study was to assess the effect of 6-year outcomes in Chinese patients with T2D and a BMI < 35 kg/m2 who underwent RYGB with gastric pouches of different sizes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. There were 42 patients in the large gastric pouch group (L) and 53 patients in the small gastric pouch group (S). Baseline demographic history, pre- and postoperative BMI, waist circumference, and glucose- and lipid metabolism-related indicators were compared. Results: Assessments were completed in 100%, 100%, 93.6%, and 89.4% of patients at baseline, 1 year, 3 years, and 6 years, respectively. At 6 years, the changes in BMI and fasting plasma glucose were greater in the S group (-4.25 ± 0.51 kg/m2 and -4.58 ± 0.73 mmol/l) than in the L group (-2.06 ± 0.48 kg/m2 and -2.64 ± 0.61 mmol/l). The independent predictors of complete remission of T2D were preoperative BMI and the size of the gastric pouch. A large gastric pouch was associated with a higher risk for marginal ulcers. Conclusions: A small gastric pouch results in better weight loss and glycemic control. High preoperative BMI and a small gastric pouch are associated with better T2D remission rates. A large gastric pouch leads to a higher incidence of marginal ulcers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity (BMI < 35 kg/m2) (n=95). Small gastric pouch vs. Large gastric pouch was evaluated on Complete remission of Type 2 Diabetes at 6 years (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.16, p=0.01). A small gastric pouch during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass significantly increased the odds of complete type 2 diabetes remission at 6 years (OR 1.11) compared to a large gastric pouch in patients with a BMI < 35 kg/m2.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: