Key result
A previous cancer diagnosis was not associated with increased total mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI after adjusting for confounders (HR 1.63; 95% CI 0.84-3.18; p=0.150).
Why the study?
STEMI and a history of cancer often coexist, but whether a previous cancer diagnosis influences outcomes in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI was unclear.
Does a previous cancer diagnosis increase total mortality in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI?
Cohort (n=917)
Does a previous cancer diagnosis increase total mortality in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI?
A previous cancer diagnosis does not independently worsen prognosis in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI after adjusting for baseline differences.
Prior cancer history does not increase adjusted mortality after primary PCI for STEMI; leaves open need for larger studies on other outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated if a previous cancer diagnosis influences the outcome of patients with STEMI treated with primary coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) and a history of cancer can coexist because both have a high incidence and prevalence. METHODS: Prospective cohort observational study, The primary end-point was total mortality. RESULTS: We included 917 patients, 53 of them (5.8%) were cancer survivors. During follow-up (median, 643 days [interquartile range, 258 to 1,015 days]), 100 patients died, 88 (10.2%) patients without a cancer diagnosis and 12 (22.6%) patients with a previous cancer diagnosis, which was significantly different (log-rank test = 8.4, p = .004). Cancer patients were older (73.4 (11.5) vs. 65.2 (13.8) years, p < .001), with a lower prevalence of previous stroke (1.1% vs. 2.2%, p = .002). Their hemoglobin concentration was also lower (13.4 (2.1) vs. 14.4 (1.7) g/L, p = .001). A trend towards a lower use of coronary stents in cancer survivors was noted (p = .061). Cancer was associated with a high probability of death (HR = 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-4.34, p = .005). When confounding variables were included, this association was no longer significant (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 0.84-3.18, p = .150). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a previous cancer diagnosis who had an acute STEMI treated by primary PCI did not seem to have a worse prognosis. The difference in the crude mortality rate can be explained by the baseline differences between both groups. Previous cancer diagnosis should not be included in the clinical decision process when a patient is having an acute STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iglesias-Gárriz et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=917). Previous cancer diagnosis vs. No previous cancer diagnosis was evaluated on total mortality (HR 1.63, 95% CI 0.84-3.18, p=0.150). A previous cancer diagnosis was not associated with increased total mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI after adjusting for confounders (HR 1.63; 95% CI 0.84-3.18; p=0.150).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: