This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is a common procedure for end-stage glenohumeral arthritis, rotator cuff disease, fracture, or failed arthroplasty. Preoperative planning software allows surgeons to assess implant placement and relies on imported bone models that come from imaging, typically a supine computed tomography (CT) scan. However, daily activities are performed upright. This study quantified the differences in scapulothoracic and glenohumeral joint angles between preoperative supine and upright imaging. Patient-specific changes varied widely for scapulothoracic upward/downward rotation (+0.5° to -17.6°), pro/retraction (+10.4° to -22.4°), and posterior/anterior tilt (+17.4° to -9.3°), as well as glenohumeral elevation/depression (+26.7° to -4.0°), anterior/posterior plane of elevation (+19.3° to -5.6°), and internal/external axial rotation (+5.5° to -44.6°). Conclusion: Patient-specific variation in joint angles between supine and upright poses demonstrates gross changes in both magnitude and direction that exceed common thresholds in implant selection and placement. Thus, preoperative planning using supine CT may inaccurately pose bones, with consequent effects on the surgical plan, the resultant shoulder biomechanics, and clinical outcomes. Preoperative planning software should consider the influence of supine posture when orienting bones for surgical planning.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
King et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: