This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction: Shared urban mobility systems are critical infrastructure for ensuring essential travel and maintaining socioeconomic stability during public health crises. However, the long-term system resilience and spatial-temporal equity of these networks under severe macro-shocks (e.g., the COVID-19 pandemic) and subsequent recovery phases remain underexplored. Methods: Utilizing a comprehensive longitudinal dataset (2019-2024) from Ningbo, China, this study constructs a multi-dimensional evaluation framework encompassing market supply, operational performance, economic viability, and service equity. We applied a projection pursuit-weighted TOPSIS model to quantify the overall resilience trajectory. Furthermore, to uncover structural disparities in service access, tensor decomposition and the Theil index were employed to measure the spatial-temporal distribution of passenger waiting times. Results: The empirical findings reveal that the socio-ecological resilience of the ride-hailing system exhibited severe vulnerability during the initial COVID-19 outbreak (Q1 2020), with closeness values dropping to 0.290. While overall resilience peaked during the post-pandemic recovery (Q4 2023), the system experienced a structural "involution," characterized by continuous supply expansion that outpaced demand, leading to degraded per-vehicle operational efficiency. Moreover, the study identified significant spatial-temporal inequalities in mobility access during pandemic restrictions (2020-2021), which were progressively mitigated following strict regulatory interventions and market normalization. Conclusion: This six-year longitudinal analysis highlights the dynamic vulnerability and adaptive capacity of urban mobility networks under prolonged public health emergencies. To build crisis-resilient cities, policymakers must implement data-driven, dynamic supply-demand regulatory mechanisms to prevent resource misallocation, safeguard the livelihoods of gig workers, and ensure equitable access to essential mobility services across all urban sectors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: