Prospective cohort study shows higher Mayo Adhesive Probability scores predict reduced stone clearance and increased complications in mini-PCNL, indicating its value for preoperative risk assessment.
Objectives This study aims to prospectively evaluate the utility of Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score, for determining stone-free status and post-operative complications in patients undergoing mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).Methods A prospective cohort study of 154 patients undergoing mini-PCNL at a single tertiary care centre in eastern India was conducted. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their preoperative MAP score: group 1 (MAP score < 3, n = 103) and group 2 (MAP score ≥ 3, n = 51). Preoperative patient and stone characteristics were recorded. Postoperative outcomes, including stone-free rate, complications, haemoglobin drop, need for transfusion, fever, operative time and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. MAP score and complications according to Clavien-Dindo grade were correlated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r). ROC curves were generated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MAP score in predicting binary outcomes (blood transfusion, fever, stone-free status).Results Patients in group 2 had lower stone-free rate (70.6% vs. 89.3%, p = 0.003), higher complications (39.21% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.007) including post operative fever and greater haemoglobin drop (1.25 vs. 0.369 g/dL, p < 0.001) with higher transfusions. Higher MAP score correlated with increasing severity of complications (r = 0.285, p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated the MAP score’s ability to predict stone-free rate, need for transfusion and postoperative fever.Conclusions Higher MAP score (≥3) is significantly associated with lower stone-free rates, higher incidence of complications and greater blood loss in patients undergoing mini PCNL. Thus, incorporating the MAP score into preoperative assessment can aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients, informed patient counselling, better surgical planning and aggressive infection control measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: