Cross-sectional analysis reveals balance confidence splits into three distinct domains after chronic stroke, indicating a more targeted framework for post-stroke mobility assessment.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the construct of balance confidence, as measured by the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, consists of three factors in those with chronic stroke. DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of preexisting data from a research registry. SETTING: Academic institution. PARTICIPANTS: 248 community-dwelling adults with a history of one or more strokes, verified by CT/MRI report or past provider. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We proposed that the ABC-scale items comprise three balance confidence domains: 1) anticipatory control, 2) walking balance, and 3) reactive balance. We assigned ABC Q1,2,8,10-12 to walking balance, Q3-7,9 to anticipatory control, and Q13-16 to reactive balance. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed to test this hypothesized structure, with outcomes including the Goodness-of-Fit indices (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis Fit Index (TLI)). RESULTS: All indicators significantly loaded as hypothesized. CONCLUSION(S): These results suggest that the items in the ABC scale represent three domains of anticipatory control, walking balance, and reactive balance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kellaher et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: