Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Perspective review reveals limited clinical outcome evidence for digital tools in perioperative care, highlighting the need to bridge the accuracy-outcome gap.
The rapid digital transformation of healthcare has positioned perioperative medicine at the forefront of technological innovation, a theme central to the inaugural ParmAI conference. This perspective synthesizes multidisciplinary insights from the event, charting the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), telemedicine, and wearable devices across the entire surgical patient journey. While digital tools hold immense promise in shifting care from reactive to proactive paradigms across the perioperative pathway, evidence for improvement in hard clinical outcomes remains limited for several of these technologies. The central challenge for digital innovation is bridging this accuracy-outcome gap. Furthermore, we emphasize that proactive governance, stringent cybersecurity, legal compliance, ethical oversight, and environmental sustainability are essential prerequisites for the safe and responsible implementation of these tools. Achieving true precision anesthesia demands rigorous interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure that AI technologies prioritize measurable patient benefits and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bignami et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: