Discourse analysis uncovers chronological mismatches between political rhetoric and modern social contexts in European leaders, highlighting how outdated discursive structures persist over time.
This paper is a Discourse Analysis investigation on discursive hysteresis, a phenomenon that occurs when there is a chronological mismatch between a political actor’s discourse and the present social context he operates upon, whereby elements from a previous discursive structure persist even though they have become outdated. Even though the concept of hysteresis has long been applied in the fields of Economics and Sociology, it remains surprisingly overlooked among political scientists. The paper will introduce the notion of ‘discursive hysteresis’ through two case studies. The first focuses on Silvio Berlusconi and his relationship with the threat of Communism, while the second examines Nathalie Arthaud’s fixation with the working-class as a prominent political subject. Additional examples of hysteresis will be tangentially explored to expand this preliminary typology of the phenomenon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. R. Rueda (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: