Examines discursive shifts in Hungarian parliament, indicating structural changes in democracy, suggesting implications for contemporary governance.
The parliament, as a key component of the public sphere, is both a reflection of and a stage for the post-democratic transition. Our study examines Hungarian parliamentary discourse as an indicator of a transition in which democratic institutions persist yet become hollow and are repurposed for charismatic legitimacy. Using natural language processing, we analyse a corpus of all parliamentary speeches from 1998 to 2020, employing keyness analysis and Jaccard similarity to track discursive shifts over time. By interpreting these shifts through a field-theoretical lens, we explore how political parties construct legitimacy – whether through legal-bureaucratic or charismatic means – and how ideological differentiation occurs within an increasingly fragmented media landscape. Our findings reveal patterns of discursive stability and transformation, shedding light on Hungary's role as a pioneering "political laboratory" of post-democracy. This study contributes to the understanding of the structural changes that are reshaping contemporary Western democracies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rakovics et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: