The elections of 2026 in Hungary indicated a historical turning point, the collapse of the authoritarian Orbán-regime. The country is at a pivotal moment in terms of democratization; however, it remains an open question how can such a unique historical opportunity be realistically grasped, and how can democratization be imagined in a country lacking democratic traditions? Integrating critical social theory and a practice-based approach, my article reflects on this unique moment by reconstructing a deliberative constitutional process specifically designed for the post-Orbán era. First, the social history of democratic culture in Hungary is sketched: it is argued that throughout the 20th century, the emergence of a democratic culture was systematically undermined. This diagnosis orients the social theoretical section: with the help of Habermas, the normative core of deliberative democracy is reconstructed; with the help of Luhmann’s systems and Latour’s actor-network theory, those technological “crutches” are introduced, which can help overcome the limitations of missing democratic-communicative skills by relying on digital communication tools. In the final section, a concrete model of a deliberative constitutional process is elaborated. Although the article focuses on Hungary, it aims to inspire others seeking to further democratization through deliberative means in the absence of democratic traditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domonkos Sík (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: