Computational simulation reveals peak aerodynamic stress during train exit in fully enclosed noise barriers, highlighting critical load vulnerabilities in structural steel columns and glass panels.
Fully enclosed noise barriers (FENBs) are widely used in high-speed railway systems to mitigate environmental noise; however, the transient aerodynamic loads generated by train passage can induce complex structural responses. The relationship between the spatial–temporal evolution of these aerodynamic loads and the dynamic response of the complete FENB structural system remains insufficiently understood. To address this issue, this study develops a sequential computational fluid dynamics–finite element analysis (CFD–FEA) framework that directly relates the transient pressure evolution during the complete train-passage process to the deformation and stress responses of the principal FENB components. The unsteady aerodynamic field generated by high-speed train passage is simulated using a moving-mesh CFD model, and the resulting time-dependent pressure loads are subsequently applied to a finite-element structural model. Train speeds ranging from 250 to 330 km/h are considered. The results reveal strongly transient and spatially non-uniform pressure distributions inside the FENB, characterized by nose-induced compression, a middle negative-pressure region, and wake-induced pressure fluctuations. Both structural deformation and equivalent stress increase with train speed, and the exit stage produces the most pronounced structural response because of the strong negative-pressure effect. Different structural components exhibit distinct response characteristics, with localized stress concentrations occurring in the glass panels and H-section steel columns. By establishing the correspondence between transient aerodynamic pressure evolution, train-passage stages, and component-level structural responses, this study provides a more comprehensive understanding of the aerodynamic load–structural response mechanism of FENBs and provides a basis for structural design and engineering assessment under increasing train speeds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: