In vitro study demonstrates that nanostructure geometry alters neurite guidance and calcium signaling in cultured neurons, highlighting the role of precise topography in neural interface design.
In recent years, nanostructures with varying shapes, dimensions, aspect‐ratios, and spatial arrangements have been used to modulate neuronal growth and function. However, the influence of specific geometrical parameters of nanostructures on neuronal growth and signaling remains unclear. This work investigates neuronal growth and signaling in response to the geometry of nanostructures with comparable height and spatial arrangement. Specifically, arrays of isotropically arranged indium phosphide (InP) nanostructures were fabricated with a constant height (2.5 µm) and pitch (2 µm), while varying the tip and base diameters from 25 and 550 nm to yield nanoneedles, nanowires and nanopillars. All three geometries supported long‐term culture of neurons, enabled directional growth of neuronal circuits and resulted in increased firing rate of neuronal signals. However, there were key differences in the degree of directionality, membrane deformation, and calcium‐activity across these geometries. Despite similar dimensions and spatial arrangement, a 100 nm variation in the gap and tip‐diameter of the nanostructures influenced membrane penetration, neuron pinning and neurite guidance, which in turn affected neuronal network signaling. This study holds significance in design and fabrication of appropriate nanoscale geometries for understanding and modulating spatiotemporal dynamics of the nervous system at single cell and network level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: