Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative modeling demonstrates distinct structural trade-offs between flat and conventional slab systems in a mixed-use building, highlighting context-dependent structural selection.
ABSTRACTThe selection of an appropriate floor system significantly influences the structural efficiency, materialconsumption, construction speed, and architectural flexibility of multi-storey buildings. This paper presents asystematic comparative analysis and design of two widely used reinforced-concrete floor systems—theconventional beam–slab system and the flat-slab system—applied to the critical GF TOP storey of a real mixeduse commercial and residential building (Project MADNAIK). Two independent three-dimensional modelswere developed in ETABS 21.0.0 under identical geometry, material properties (M25 concrete and Fe 500steel), column layout, and gravity loading. Analysis was performed for the governing ultimate combination1.5(DL + LL) in accordance with IS 456:2000. Design strips conforming to Clause 31 were employed for theflat-slab model, while the conventional model utilised a hierarchical beam–slab load path. Results indicate thatthe flat-slab system develops a maximum hogging moment approximately 2.11 times and a maximum shearforce approximately 2.63 times higher than the critical beam of the conventional system. Conversely, theconventional system exhibits a substantially higher mid-span sagging moment. Column axial loads differ byonly 3.3%. Service deflection of the flat slab remains within codal limits. Material quantification shows lowerconcrete volume but significantly higher reinforcement demand for the flat-slab alternative, offset by thecomplete elimination of beam formwork. The study demonstrates that neither system is universally superior.The conventional system offers lower peak forces and familiar detailing, while the flat-slab system provides acontinuous soffit, reduced formwork complexity, and faster construction. The quantitative force ratios,deflection data, and material quantities generated herein supply a practical, code-compliant basis for informedfloor-system selection in similar mid-rise mixed-use projects.Analysis and Design of Critical Floor of Commercial andResidential Building Using Conventional Slab and Flat SlabSystems: A Comparative Study1Ninad Pradip Chougule, 2Dr. N. S. Bembade 3Mr. Vijaykumar G. Sawant1PG Scholar, Department of Civil EngineeringPadmabhooshan Vasantraodada Patil Institute of Technology, Budhgaon, Sangli –416304, India2 & 3 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil EngineeringPadmabhooshan Vasantraodada Patil Institute of Technology, Budhgaon, Sangli –416304, India
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ninad Pradip Chougule, Dr. N. S. Bembade, Mr. Vijaykumar G. Sawant (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: