Randomized trial finds positive psychotherapy with text messaging does not improve smoking abstinence in adult smokers, indicating that added exercises may diminish digital support efficacy.
Introduction Positive Psychology Interventions (PPIs) aim to enhance well-being and have shown promise in improving mental health and augmenting behavioral interventions. Although pilot studies have suggested PPIs may support smoking cessation, no full-scale randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have tested their efficacy in this context. Method In this RCT, 271 adults who smoked > 5 cigarettes per day (55.2% female, mean age = 49.2 (SD = 12.0); average cigarettes per day = 16.9 [SD = 7.0]) were randomized to six sessions of Positive Psychotherapy for Smoking Cessation with text messaging (PPT-S+) or a time-matched standard treatment with text messaging (ST+). All participants received eight weeks of nicotine replacement therapy (transdermal nicotine patch). The primary outcome was biochemically-confirmed 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence at 12, 26, and 52 post quit date. Results Seven-day point-prevalence abstinence did not differ significantly by condition: 20.9%, 19.4%, and 19.4% at 12, 26, and 52 weeks in PPT-S+ compared to 19.1%, 20.6%, and 21.4% at 12, 26, and 52 weeks in ST+. Conditions did not differ in self-reported use of positive psychology-consistent strategies for quitting smoking at posttreatment, representing an implementation failure, and these strategies did not significantly predict subsequent smoking outcomes. Those in ST+ rated the text messaging program as significantly more helpful than those in PPT-S+. Conclusions PPT-S+ did not improve smoking cessation outcomes compared to a time-matched control. The completion of positive psychology exercises through text messaging may have reduced the helpfulness of the text-messaging support program received in both conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kahler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: