Computational study demonstrates turbulent heat transfer predictions in lattice-structured cooling channels, highlighting trade-offs between RANS and LES accuracy.
Matrix cooling is an internal cooling concept for gas turbine blades that combines structural reinforcement with enhanced heat transfer through a rib-crossing lattice geometry. The repeated flow redirection generates strong shear layers, impingement, and vortical structures that significantly influence turbulent transport and heat transfer. This study presents a numerical investigation of turbulent flow and heat transfer in a lattice-structured matrix cooling channel using Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) approaches, validated against experimental data at Re = 24100. Steady RANS simulations are performed using k–ω, k–ω SST, Realizable k–ε, and Launder–Sharma k–ε models. The RANS results reproduce global trends of heat transfer and pressure drop, with area-averaged heat transfer coefficients predicted within approximately ±3% of the experimental value, while showing limited capability in resolving local heat transfer variations. LES computations are conducted using several subgrid-scale (SGS) models, including WALE, One-Equation Eddy Viscosity (OEEVM), Smagorinsky, and the Localized Dynamic k-Equation Model (LDKM). A mesh-refinement study demonstrates that increasing grid resolution improves LES accuracy, reducing the discrepancy in area-averaged heat transfer from more than 25% on coarse meshes to approximately 5-8% on fine and very-fine meshes. The choice of SGS model significantly affects heat transfer predictions, whereas pressure drop remains comparatively insensitive. The results quantify the trade-off between predictive accuracy and computational cost and provide guidance for selecting turbulence modeling strategies for engineering analysis of matrix cooling configurations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: