Key result
In patients with severe CIED-associated pneumothorax, chest tube insertion compared to conservative management was associated with a higher hospital admission rate (100% vs 63%, P=0.02).
Why the study?
Pneumothorax is a common complication of CIED procedures, but there is a paucity of data on its natural history and management.
Does chest tube insertion compared to conservative management improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe CIED-associated pneumothorax?
Cohort (n=86)
No
Does chest tube insertion compared to conservative management improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe CIED-associated pneumothorax?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An initial strategy of conservative management for severe CIED-associated pneumothorax may be feasible and is associated with shorter hospital stays compared to chest tube insertion.
Background Pneumothorax is a common complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures. There is a paucity of data on the natural history and management of a CIED-associated pneumothorax. Methods This is a single-centre retrospective study of all consecutive patients with a CIED-associated pneumothorax between March 2010 and March 2020. Pneumothorax size was determined on all chest x-rays after device implantation and before chest tube insertion (if placed). Changes in pneumothorax size on serial chest x-rays were reported. Clinical outcomes in patients with a severe-sized pneumothorax treated with a chest tube were compared with those treated conservatively. Results A total of 86 CIED-associated pneumothoraxes were identified, with 55 (63.9%) patients having a pneumothorax severe in size. Thirty-seven patients with a severe pneumothorax received a chest tube, whereas 18 were managed conservatively. Chest tube use was associated with a higher rate of admission to hospital (100% vs 63%, P = 0.02) for patients undergoing outpatient procedure, longer length of stay (6.3 ± 3.9 vs 2.7 ± 2.9 days, P = 0.04), but fewer chest x-rays (1.9 ± 0.7 vs 4.1 ± 2.5, P = 0.002). Conclusion An initial strategy of conservative management of a CIED-associated pneumothorax in select patients may be feasible and safe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Cardiac implantable electronic device associated pneumothorax (n=86). Chest tube insertion vs. Conservative management was evaluated on Hospital admission for patients undergoing outpatient procedure (p=0.02). In patients with severe CIED-associated pneumothorax, chest tube insertion compared to conservative management was associated with a higher hospital admission rate (100% vs 63%, P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: