Key result
Concomitant ascending aortic dilatation in patients undergoing TAVI did not significantly affect 1-year survival compared to patients with a non-dilatated aorta (87% vs 83%, P=0.573).
Why the study?
Is TAVI safe and does it provide similar mid-term survival in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant ascending aortic dilatation compared to those without dilatation?
Population
457 patients with severe aortic stenosis meeting inclusion criteria for TAVI, including 98 patients with…
Comparison
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs Patients with non-dilatated ascending aorta…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
median 14 months
Authors
Loading...
Supports TAVI feasibility with aortic dilatation; leaves open need for longer-term and randomized data.
Cohort (n=457)
Is TAVI safe and does it provide similar mid-term survival in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant ascending aortic dilatation compared to those without dilatation?
Absolute Event Rate: 87% vs 83%
p-value: p=0.573
TAVI is safe and provides similar mid-term survival in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant ascending aortic dilatation compared to those without dilatation.
Rylski et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=457). Ascending aortic dilatation vs. Non-dilatated ascending aorta was evaluated on 1-year survival (p=0.573). Concomitant ascending aortic dilatation in patients undergoing TAVI did not significantly affect 1-year survival compared to patients with a non-dilatated aorta (87% vs 83%, P=0.573).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: