Key result
Abciximab during primary angioplasty for acute MI is linked to ~51% fewer major events.
Why the study?
Abciximab improves the outcome of angioplasty, but its effect in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction had not been investigated.
Does abciximab improve outcomes in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=182)
Does abciximab improve outcomes in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction?
Relative Risk: 0.49 (95% CI 0.24–0.99)
Absolute Event Rate: 17% vs 32.4%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Abciximab administration during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction significantly reduces the composite of unstable angina, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and death, particularly when a 12-hour infusion is completed.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (MI) when performed with or without the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antibody, abciximab. BACKGROUND: Abciximab improves the outcome of angioplasty but the effect of abciximab in primary angioplasty has not been investigated. METHODS: Data were collected from a computerized database. Follow-up was by telephone or review of outpatient or hospital readmission records. RESULTS: A total of 182 consecutive patients were included; 103 received abciximab and 79 did not. The procedural success rate was 95% in the two groups. At 30-day follow-up, the composite event rate of unstable angina, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization and death from all causes was 13.5% in the group of patients who did not receive abciximab, 4% (p < 0.05) in the abciximab group and 2.4% (p < 0.05) in the subgroup of patients (n = 87) who completed the 12-h abciximab infusion. At the end of follow-up (mean 7+/-4 months), the composite event rate was 32.4%, 17% (p < 0.05) and 13.1% (p < 0.01) in these three categories respectively. Abciximab bolus followed by a 12-h infusion was an independent predictor of event-free survival, in a Cox proportional hazards model (relative risk 0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.99; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab given at the time of primary angioplasty may improve the short- and medium-term outcome of patients with acute MI, especially when a 12-h infusion is completed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azar et al. (1998) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (MI) (n=182). Abciximab vs. No abciximab was evaluated on Composite event rate of unstable angina, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization and death from all causes (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.99, p=< 0.05). Abciximab bolus followed by a 12-h infusion during primary angioplasty for acute MI was associated with improved event-free survival (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.24-0.99; p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: