Key result
The N-terminal DID and C-terminal DAD domains of FRL2 interact in vivo and in vitro without inhibiting FRL2 activity, challenging current models of formin autoregulation.
The finding that FRL2's DID and DAD domains interact without inhibiting its activity suggests that current models of formin autoregulation via steric hindrance need revision.
Challenges formin autoregulation models; leaves open relevance to human cardiovascular biology.
Formin homology proteins are a highly conserved family of cytoskeletal remodeling proteins best known for their ability to induce the formation of long unbranched actin filaments. They accomplish this by nucleating the de novo polymerization of F-actin and also by acting as F-actin barbed end "leaky cappers" that allow filament elongation while antagonizing the function of capping proteins. More recently, it has been reported that the FH2 domains of FRL1 and mDia2 and the plant formin AFH1 are able to bind and bundle actin filaments via distinct mechanisms. We find that like FRL1, FRL2 and FRL3 are also able to bind and bundle actin filaments. In the case of FRL3, this activity is dependent upon a proximal DAD/WH2-like domain that is found C-terminal to the FH2 domain. In addition, we show that, like other Diaphanous-related formins, FRL3 activity is subject to autoregulation mediated by the interaction between its N-terminal DID and C-terminal DAD. In contrast, the DID and DAD of FRL2 also interact in vivo and in vitro but without inhibiting FRL2 activity. These data suggest that current models describing DID/DAD autoregulation via steric hindrance of FH2 activity must be revised. Finally, unlike other formins, we find that the FH2 and N-terminal dimerization domains of FRL2 and FRL3 are able to form hetero-oligomers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaillant et al. (2008) studied this question. FRL2 and FRL3 was evaluated. The N-terminal DID and C-terminal DAD domains of FRL2 interact in vivo and in vitro without inhibiting FRL2 activity, challenging current models of formin autoregulation.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: