Key result
A second training session reduced the operator variability of the short-axis end-diastolic area measurement from 17% to 6% (P<0.025).
Why the study?
Does additional training improve the reproducibility of left ventricular measurements using acoustic quantification compared to conventional 2-D echocardiography in normal subjects?
Observational (n=22)
Does additional training improve the reproducibility of left ventricular measurements using acoustic quantification compared to conventional 2-D echocardiography in normal subjects?
A single training session appears adequate for reproducible estimation of left ventricular volumes using acoustic quantification in echocardiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Additional training may reduce short-axis measurement variability; leaves open optimal protocols for acoustic quantification reproducibility.
Acoustic quantification (AQ) of two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiograms provides online estimation of left ventricular (LV) size and function. However, edge detection with AQ is influenced by gain settings and is therefore operator dependent. Our purpose was to compare AQ and conventional 2-D echo measurements of LV size and function obtained by different operators and to evaluate the influence of training on these measurements. A cardiac sonographer without previous experience with the AQ system was trained by an experienced operator. Twenty-two normal males (age, 28 +/- 4 years) participated in the study. Images were recorded with conventional 2-D and AQ echo from the short-axis and apical four-chamber views. During the initial training period, five subjects were imaged by the sonographer under the supervision of the trainer. At the initial study session, 12 subjects were imaged independently by the two operators. Following a second training period with five different subjects, the same initial 12 subjects were again imaged at a second study session. LV cavity areas were traced from the conventional 2-D echocardiograms and measured from the AQ waveforms at end-diastole and end-systole. Volumes were calculated using the single-plane area-length method. Ejection fraction (EF) was calculated from volumes. Reproducibility was determined by comparing the variability of AQ and conventional 2-D echo measurements obtained at the two sessions. A second training session reduced the operator variability only of the short-axis end-diastolic area measurement (17 +/- 11% vs 6 +/- 5%, P < 0.025). We conclude that a single training session may be adequate for the reproducible estimation of ventricular volumes with the AQ method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vandenberg et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=22). Second training session vs. Initial training session was evaluated on Operator variability of the short-axis end-diastolic area measurement (p=<0.025). A second training session reduced the operator variability of the short-axis end-diastolic area measurement from 17% to 6% (P<0.025).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: