Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Polymer-laminated electrochromic devices composed of WO 3 and Ni͑OH͒ 2 films were fabricated on indium tin oxide ͑ITO͒coated glass and polyethylene terephthalate ͑PET͒ substrates.In each of the devices, data on the transmittance modulance, coloration efficiency, and response time were collected.The transmittance modulation of the glass device was larger than that of the PET device because the large amount of charge was incorporated into each WO 3 and Ni͑OH͒ 2 film in glass device.The coloration efficiency, however, was comparable between the two devices, with reversible charge movement and the absence of side reactions.The PET device showed a longer coloring/bleaching performance regardless of whether it had a lower ITO electrical sheet resistance compared to a glass device, which can be attributed to high interfacial charge-transfer resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nah et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: