Why the study?
Does prehabilitation improve postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing elective surgery?
Population
Adults undergoing elective surgery
Design
Systematic_review
Key result
This paper is a systematic review protocol designed to evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation programs compared to usual care for adults undergoing elective surgery.
Authors
Loading...
Prehabilitation lacks postoperative benefits on function, QoL, or pain; challenges broad adoption and leaves optimal dosing open for targeted trials.
Systematic Review
Does prehabilitation improve postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing elective surgery?
This is a protocol for a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing elective surgery.
Wright et al. (2016) conducted a systematic review in Elective surgery. Prehabilitation vs. Usual care was evaluated on Postoperative complications, patient readmission, length of stay, length of rehabilitation required, and health-related quality of life. This paper is a systematic review protocol designed to evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation programs compared to usual care for adults undergoing elective surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: