Key result
Among patients taking acetylsalicylic acid for secondary stroke prevention, 9.1% exhibited laboratory ASA resistance, which was associated with higher LDL, heart rate, and haematocrit levels.
Why the study?
What is the prevalence of and what factors are associated with resistance to acetylsalicylic acid in patients with TIA or ischaemic stroke?
Cross-Sectional (n=198)
No
What is the prevalence of and what factors are associated with resistance to acetylsalicylic acid in patients with TIA or ischaemic stroke?
Acetylsalicylic acid resistance was detected in 9.1% of patients with cerebrovascular disease and was associated with longer ASA therapy, increased heart rate, higher LDL concentration, and higher haematocrit.
Laboratory ASA resistance should not alter secondary prevention; leaves open whether targeting LDL, heart rate, or haematocrit improves outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of resistance to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), used for secondary prevention of stroke, including the assessment of risk factors associated with the lack of ASA anti-aggregatory action. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients after a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or ischaemic stroke in the acute (n = 111) and chronic phase (n = 87) were enrolled in the study. The assessment of platelet function was performed by whole blood impedance aggregometry using a multi-channel platelet function analyser (Multiplate). RESULTS: A proper response to ASA was found in 121 patients (61.1%) (ASA responders), a partial response to ASA in 59 patients (29.8%) (ASA partial responders), and ASA resistance in 18 patients (9.1%) (ASA non-responders). Acetylsalicylic acid resistance was observed more frequently in the chronic phase. The mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL) concentration was higher in ASA non-responders (p = 0.02). The mean heart rate (p = 0.03) and the mean haematocrit (p = 0.03) were higher in the group of ASA partial responders and ASA non-responders. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists were more often used in the group of ASA partial responders and ASA non-responders (p = 0.04). Diuretics were more rarely used by ASA non-responders, whereas fibrates were more rarely used by ASA partial responders. CONCLUSIONS: The method enabled the detection of ASA resistance in some patients with cerebrovascular disease. The study revealed some possible risk factors of ASA resistance: long ASA therapy, increased heart rate, higher LDL concentration, and higher haematocrit value. The relationship between the effect of ASA and other medications (angiotensin II receptor blockers, fibrates, diuretics) requires further study. Platelet function monitoring should be considered in patients at a greater risk of ASA resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Łabuz-Roszak et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or ischaemic stroke (n=198). Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) resistance vs. ASA responders was evaluated on Prevalence of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) resistance. Among patients taking acetylsalicylic acid for secondary stroke prevention, 9.1% exhibited laboratory ASA resistance, which was associated with higher LDL, heart rate, and haematocrit levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: