Key result
HbA1c levels will be evaluated for their predictive value on mortality and readmission in patients with heart failure in this planned systematic review and meta-analysis.
Why the study?
Conflicting evidence obscures clear HbA1c cutoffs across heart failure populations, necessitating an evaluation of its predictive value and optimal range for mortality and readmission.
Do HbA1c levels predict mortality and readmission in patients with heart failure?
Systematic Review
Do HbA1c levels predict mortality and readmission in patients with heart failure?
This protocol outlines a planned systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the predictive value and optimal range of HbA1c for mortality and readmission in patients with heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid HF risk stratification; leaves open optimal HbA1c cutoffs for mortality/readmission.
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that HbA1c levels, a common clinical indicator of chronic glucose metabolism over the preceding 2-3 months, are independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including heart failure. However, conflicting evidence obscures clear cutoffs of HbA1c levels in various heart failure populations. The aim of this review is to assess the possible predictive value and optimal range of HbA1c on mortality and readmission in patients with heart failure. METHODS: A systematic and comprehensive search will be performed using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases before December 2022 to identify relevant studies. All-cause mortality is the prespecified primary endpoint. Cardiovascular death and heart failure readmission are secondary endpoints of interest. We will only include prospective and retrospective cohort studies and place no restrictions on the language, race, region, or publication period. The ROBINS-I tool will be used to assess the quality of each included research. If there were sufficient studies, we will conduct a meta-analysis with pooled relative risks and corresponding 95% confidence intervals to evaluate the possible predictive value of HbA1c for mortality and readmission. Otherwise, we will undertake a narrative synthesis. Heterogeneity and publication bias will be assessed. If heterogeneity was significant among included studies, a sensitivity analysis or subgroup analysis will be used to explore the source of heterogeneity, such as diverse types of heart failure or patients with diabetes and non-diabetes. Additionally, we will conduct meta-regression to examine the time-effect and treatment-effect modifiers on all-cause mortality compared between different quantile of HbA1c levels. Finally, a restricted cubic spline model may be used to explore the dose-response relationship between HbA1c and adverse outcomes. DISCUSSION: This planned analysis is anticipated to identify the predictive value of HbA1c for mortality and readmission in patients with heart failure. Improved understanding of different HbA1c levels and their specific effect on diverse types of heart failure or patients with diabetes and non-diabetes is expected to be figured out. Importantly, a dose-response relationship or optimal range of HbA1c will be determined to instruct clinicians and patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration details: CRD42021276067.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure. HbA1c levels vs. Various categorical HbA1c levels was evaluated on All-cause mortality. HbA1c levels will be evaluated for their predictive value on mortality and readmission in patients with heart failure in this planned systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: