A multicenter retrospective study demonstrates improved visual acuity and corneal steepness in keratoconus, suggesting variable-thickness ring segments effectively remodel irregular corneas.
Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of implanting variable thickness intracorneal ring segments (Vt-ICRS) in the treatment of keratoconus. Patients and methods:A retrospective multicenter study from seven centers in five different countries, including patients who underwent Vt-ICRS implantation with a minimum follow-up period of 2 months.Results: A total of 56 eyes from seven surgeons were included in the analysis, with a mean follow-up of 20.8 ± 21.8 months.The mean patient age was 31.1 ± 12 years (range, 17-69 years).Most procedures (85.4%) utilized a 5 mm arc, while the remaining 14.6% using a 6 mm arc.Arc lengths were distributed as follows: 140° (3.7%), 150° (24.1%), 160° (44.4%), and 180° (27.8%).Arc thickness combinations included 150/250 µm (58.3%), 200/300 µm (27.1%), 250/350/250 µm (10.4%), and 200 µm (4.2%).Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved significantly from 0.345 ± 0.172 to 0.716 ± 0.223 (p < 0.001).The mean Big D value decreased from 8.47 ± 2.77 to 7.46 ± 2.81 (p < 0.001), and vertical coma improved from -1.54 ± 3.35 to -0.524 ± 1.56 (p = 0.018).The mean Kmax decreased from 54.2 ± 3.52D preoperatively to 51.0 ± 4.11D postoperatively (p < 0.001), K1 from 45.7 ± 4.10D to 44.7 ± 5.04D (p < 0.001), and K2 from 50.1 ± 5.48D to 47.6 ± 5.47D (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Preliminary results showed improvement in all measured outcomes; however, a longer follow-up period is needed, and comparison between classic ICRS should be taken into consideration in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosny et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: