Key result
A framework combining hemodynamic modeling and machine learning using 3D rotational angiography predicted peak-to-peak pressure drop with a mean absolute error of 2.98 mmHg pre-operatively.
Why the study?
Coarctation of the aorta causes narrowing that obstructs systemic blood flow, motivating the development of a framework to automatically and robustly personalize aortic hemodynamic computations for pre- and post-intervention assessment from 3DRA data.
Does a framework combining hemodynamic modelling and machine learning accurately predict pressure drop in CoA patients compared to catheter measurements?
Does a framework combining hemodynamic modelling and machine learning accurately predict pressure drop in CoA patients compared to catheter measurements?
Effect estimate: Mean absolute error 2.98 mmHg (pre-operative) and 2.11 mmHg (post-operative)
A novel framework combining hemodynamic modeling and machine learning using 3D rotational angiography can accurately and efficiently estimate pressure drops in patients with aortic coarctation.
May support personalized CoA hemodynamic assessment from 3DRA; leaves open validation before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: Coarctation of Aorta (CoA) is a congenital disease consisting of a narrowing that obstructs the systemic blood flow. This proof-of-concept study aimed to develop a framework for automatically and robustly personalizing aortic hemodynamic computations for the assessment of pre- and post-intervention CoA patients from 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) data. METHODS: We propose a framework that combines hemodynamic modelling and machine learning (ML) based techniques, and rely on 3DRA data for non-invasive pressure computation in CoA patients. The key features of our framework are a parameter estimation method for calibrating inlet and outlet boundary conditions, and regional mechanical wall properties, to ensure that the computational results match the patient-specific measurements, and an improved ML based pressure drop model capable of predicting the instantaneous pressure drop for a wide range of flow conditions and anatomical CoA variations. RESULTS: We evaluated the framework by investigating 6 patient datasets, under pre- and post-operative setting, and, since all calibration procedures converged successfully, the proposed approach is deemed robust. We compared the peak-to-peak and the cycle-averaged pressure drop computed using the reduced-order hemodynamic model with the catheter based measurements, before and after virtual and actual stenting. The mean absolute error for the peak-to-peak pressure drop, which is the most relevant measure for clinical decision making, was 2.98 mmHg for the pre- and 2.11 mmHg for the post-operative setting. Moreover, the proposed method is computationally efficient: the average execution time was of only [Formula: see text] minutes on a standard hardware configuration. CONCLUSION: The use of 3DRA for hemodynamic modelling could allow for a complete hemodynamic assessment, as well as virtual interventions or surgeries and predictive modeling. However, before such an approach can be used routinely, significant advancements are required for automating the workflow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study studied Coarctation of Aorta (CoA) (n=6). Hemodynamic modelling and machine learning framework using 3D rotational angiography vs. Catheter based measurements was evaluated on Mean absolute error for the peak-to-peak pressure drop (Mean absolute error 2.98 mmHg (pre-operative) and 2.11 mmHg (post-operative)). A framework combining hemodynamic modeling and machine learning using 3D rotational angiography predicted peak-to-peak pressure drop with a mean absolute error of 2.98 mmHg pre-operatively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: