Key result
Acute alterations in left ventricular loading conditions significantly influenced shear wave propagation velocities after mitral valve closure, correlating positively with changes in LV EDP (r=0.83; p<0.001).
Why the study?
The influence of loading conditions on myocardial shear wave propagation velocities after mitral valve closure had not been extensively investigated.
Do acute loading alterations affect shear wave propagation velocities after mitral valve closure in a porcine model?
Do acute loading alterations affect shear wave propagation velocities after mitral valve closure in a porcine model?
Effect estimate: r=0.83
p-value: p=<0.001
Shear wave propagation velocity after mitral valve closure correlates strongly with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, highlighting its potential as a non-invasive parameter for estimating LV filling pressures.
Background Shear wave imaging (SWI) is a novel ultrasound technique based on the detection of transverse waves traveling through the myocardium using high frame rate echocardiography. These waves can be naturally induced e.g. by mitral valve closure (MVC). Their propagation velocity is dependent on the stiffness of the myocardium. Previous studies have shown the potential of SWI for the non-invasive assessment of myocardial stiffness. So far, the influence of loading on shear wave propagation velocities has not been extensively investigated. Purpose The aim of this study was to explore how loading changes affect shear wave propagation velocities after MVC. Methods Until now, 5 pigs (weight: 33.5±6.9 kg) were included. Echocardiographic images and left ventricular pressure recordings were simultaneously acquired during acute loading alterations: 1) preload was reduced by balloon occlusion of the vena cava inferior, 2) afterload was increased by balloon occlusion of the descending aorta and 3) preload was increased by intra-venous administration of 500 ml of saline. Left ventricular parasternal long-axis views were acquired with an experimental high frame rate ultrasound scanner (average frame rate: 1247±179 Hz). Shear waves were visualized on tissue acceleration maps by drawing an M-mode line along the interventricular septum. Shear wave propagation velocities after MVC were calculated by measuring the slope of the wave front on the acceleration maps (Figure A). Results The changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressures (LV EDP) between baseline and each intervention are shown in Figure B. Preload reduction resulted in significantly reduced LV EDP (p<0.01). The shear wave propagation velocities after MVC dropped with preload reduction and increased significantly by increasing afterload as well as preload (both p<0.05) (Figure C). There was a good positive correlation between the change in LV EDP and the change in shear wave velocities (r=0.83; p<0.001) (Figure D). Conclusion The shear wave propagation velocity after MVC was significantly influenced by alterations in left ventricular loading conditions and changes in these velocities were related to changes in LV EDP. These results indicate that shear wave measurements at MVC might be a potential novel parameter for the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures. More pigs will be included in the future to further confirm these findings. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek - Vlaanderen
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bezy et al. (2020) studied Myocardial stiffness (n=5). Acute loading alterations (preload reduction, afterload increase, preload increase) vs. Baseline was evaluated on Correlation between change in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LV EDP) and change in shear wave velocities (r=0.83, p=<0.001). Acute alterations in left ventricular loading conditions significantly influenced shear wave propagation velocities after mitral valve closure, correlating positively with changes in LV EDP (r=0.83; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: