Key result
A new bivariate classification stage improved the performance of a P-wave detector compared to the original algorithm and two classical methods based on ROC curve analysis.
A novel bivariate classification stage improves the accuracy of automated P-wave detection compared to classical methods.
May aid ECG algorithm development; leaves open clinical validation before practice adoption.
For more than three decades, beat-to-beat detection of electrical atrial activity has been subject of interest in the biomedical field. Several detection schemes and algorithms have been proposed; however, this problem has not been satisfactory solved and remains the main error source for accurate automatic detection and classification of supraventricular arrhythmias, mainly in ambulatory applications and in coronary care units. Some detection methods have been proposed, but none of them have been quantitatively tested or compared, due in part to the lack of a database with annotated P-waves. In this work, a classification stage is proposed as a new decision strategy to improve a P-wave detector previously developed in our laboratory. A quantitative evaluation of the original detector, the proposed classification stage and two other classical P-wave detectors is performed by means of the calculation of their receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Results show the increased performance provided by the new classification stage with respect to the originally developed algorithm and two classical P-wave detection methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández et al. (2000) studied Supraventricular arrhythmias. Bivariate classification stage for P-wave detection vs. Original detector and two classical P-wave detectors was evaluated on Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. A new bivariate classification stage improved the performance of a P-wave detector compared to the original algorithm and two classical methods based on ROC curve analysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: