Key result
Antithrombotic therapy strategies (triple therapy, dual therapy, DAPT) showed no significant differences in 1-year MACCE (14.1% vs 12.7% vs 18.5%; p=0.25) or actionable bleeding.
Why the study?
Managing PCI patients with AF presents challenges given the several potential antithrombotic therapy strategies.
Does the choice of antithrombotic therapy strategy affect 1-year MACCE and actionable bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI?
Observational
Yes
Does the choice of antithrombotic therapy strategy affect 1-year MACCE and actionable bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a real-world international registry of AF patients undergoing PCI, triple therapy was the most common strategy, with no significant differences in 1-year MACCE or actionable bleeding compared to dual therapy or DAPT.
BACKGROUND: Managing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) presents challenges given that there are several potential antithrombotic therapy (ATT) strategies. AIMS: We examined ATT patterns, agreement between subjective physician ratings and validated risk scores, physician-patient perceptions influencing ATT and 1-year outcomes. Patients completed surveys regarding treatment understanding. Primary outcomes were 1-year major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of death, myocardial infarction, definite/probable stent thrombosis, stroke, target lesion revascularisation) and actionable bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3 or 5). RESULTS: The mean patient age was 73.2±9.0 years, including 25.8% females. Triple therapy (TT: 1 anticoagulant and 2 antiplatelet agents) was prescribed in 66.5%, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in 20.7% and dual therapy (1 anticoagulant+1 antiplatelet agent) in 12.8% of patients. Physician ratings and validated risk scores showed poor agreement (stroke: kappa=0.03; bleeding: kappa=0.07). Physicians rated bleeding-related safety (93.8%) as the main factor affecting ATT choice. Patients worried about stroke over bleeding (50.6% vs 14.8%). No group differences by ATT strategy were observed in 1-year MACCE (TT 14.1% vs dual therapy 12.7% vs DAPT 18.5%; p=0.25), or actionable bleeding (14.7% vs 7.9% vs 15.1%, respectively; p=0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The AVIATOR 2 study is the first digital health study examining physician-patient perspectives on ATT choices after AF-PCI. TT was the most common strategy without differences in 1-year outcomes in ATT strategy. Physicians rated safety first when prescribing ATT; patients feared stroke over bleeding. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT02362659.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandrasekhar et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation and obstructive coronary disease revascularised with percutaneous coronary intervention. Antithrombotic therapy strategies (Triple therapy, Dual therapy, DAPT) vs. Compared among strategies was evaluated on 1-year major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and actionable bleeding (p=0.25). Antithrombotic therapy strategies (triple therapy, dual therapy, DAPT) showed no significant differences in 1-year MACCE (14.1% vs 12.7% vs 18.5%; p=0.25) or actionable bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: