OBJECTIVES: Because of its inherent strength, biocompatibility, and tooth-like color, zirconia ceramics have the potential to become an alternative to titanium as dental implant material. This study aimed at investigating the osteoblastic response to yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) with different surface topographies. METHODS: CAL72 osteoblast-like cells were cultured on machined (TZP-m), airborne particle abraded (TZP-s), and airborne particle abraded and acid-etched Y-TZP (TZP-sa) surfaces. Polystyrene and airborne particle abraded with large grit and acid-etched (SLA) titanium served as a reference control. The surface topography was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry. At culture days 3, 6, and 12, cell proliferation, at day 12 cell morphology, and cell-covered surface area were determined. RESULTS: The surface roughness of Y-TZP was increased by airborne particle abrasion and additionally by acid etching. No statistically significant differences were found between average roughness (R(a)) and maximum peak-to-valley height (R(p-v)) values of airborne particle abraded and acid-etched Y-TZP and SLA titanium. Whereas the cell proliferation assay revealed statistically significant greater values at day 3 for surface-treated Y-TZP and polystyrene cultures as compared with machined Y-TZP, no differences between the Y-TZP groups, SLA titanium, and polystyrene were observed at culture days 6 and 12. CONCLUSIONS: Cell morphology and cell-covered surface area were not affected by the type of substrate. The results suggest that roughened Y-TZP is an appropriate substrate for the proliferation and spreading of osteoblastic cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bächle et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: