Key result
Pre-spinal atropine minimized cardiac output reduction and prevented bradycardia compared to saline in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
Why the study?
Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery often causes hypotension, bradycardia, and reduced cardiac output, and atropine may prevent post-spinal bradycardia and minimize cardiac output reduction.
Does pre-spinal atropine minimize cardiac output reduction and prevent bradycardia in pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia?
RCT (n=60)
random
Does pre-spinal atropine minimize cardiac output reduction and prevent bradycardia in pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia?
Pre-spinal atropine effectively minimizes cardiac output reduction and prevents bradycardia in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
May attenuate post-spinal bradycardia and CO reduction during cesarean delivery; extends evidence for prophylactic atropine in obstetric anesthesia.
Background Spinal anesthesia is a widely used technique for cesarean delivery, but it often results in hypotension, bradycardia, and reduced cardiac output (CO). Atropine has a potent muscarinic receptor antagonist activity in the heart. It may be a good choice to prevent post-spinal bradycardia and minimize the marked CO reduction.Methods Sixty pregnant women between the ages of 18 and 40 who were ASA-PS II and planned for elective cesarean delivery were divided into two equal groups at random. Both groups received spinal anesthesia. Atropine group (I) (n = 30): patients received 0.01 mg/kg atropine, while control group (II) (n = 30): patients received the same volume of saline. CO measured by electrical cardiometry (EC) was the primary outcome where, heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MBP), stroke volume (SV), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and neonatal outcomes were the secondary outcomes.Results CO after the intervention was higher in the atropine (group I) than in the control (group II). Also, CO reduction at 5 and 10 min following spinal anesthesia was less in the group I than in the group II. Except for baseline reading, HR was significantly higher in the atropine group versus the control group. MBP was higher in the atropine group than in the control group in all readings. SV and SVR were similar in both groups. Neonatal outcomes were equivalent in both groups.Conclusion Pre-spinal atropine was effective in preventing post-spinal bradycardia and minimized CO reduction in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alansary et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in elective cesarean delivery (n=60). Atropine vs. saline was evaluated on Cardiac output (CO) measured by electrical cardiometry (EC). Pre-spinal atropine minimized cardiac output reduction and prevented bradycardia compared to saline in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: