Key result
Customized G-Branch endograft achieves ~96% technical success in complex aortic aneurysm repair.
Why the study?
To evaluate the short-term outcomes of a novel, customized multibranched G-Branch endograft for the treatment of TAAA and J/PAAA.
Cohort (n=50)
Yes
The customized G-Branch endograft demonstrated high technical success (96%) and favorable short-term safety for the endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms in a preliminary European multicenter experience.
Should not yet change practice for complex aortic aneurysms; leaves open the role of customized G-Branch endografts pending further evidence.
Summary: Background: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of a novel, customized multibranched G-Branch endograft for the treatment of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and juxta/pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (J/PAAA). Patients and methods: Between July 2023 and May 2025, 50 patients (mean age 72 years; 45 men) were treated with implantation of a customized G-Branch endograft (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) at four European regional vascular centres. The mean aneurysm diameter was 65.7 mm (range, 55–90 mm). Depending on the size and extent of the aortic pathology, 19 patients had J/PAAA and 31 had TAAA. Three patients had concomitant common iliac artery aneurysms, and one patient had a concomitant arch aneurysm. All patients underwent either an elective one-stage repair (30 patients, 60%) or a staged repair (20 patients, 40%) according to the local protocol of each centre. Multicentre outcome data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Perioperative results were assessed before discharge and during follow-ups at 1, 6, and 12 months. Results: Technical success was achieved in 96% (48/50) of patients. In-hospital mortality was 4% (2/50). Early perioperative complications occurred in six patients (11%), with no spinal cord ischemia. Over a mean follow-up of 7 months (range, 1–23 months), two patient (4%) required an unplanned late reintervention with branch extension or relining due to a type Ic and IIIb endoleaks, respectively. Of the 198 target vessels, all remained patent, yielding an overall freedom from branch instability of 99%. No patients died due to aneurysm- or procedure-related causes; one patient died 8 months postoperatively due to a major stroke. All remaining 47 patients were doing well at the last follow-up. Conclusions: Our preliminary experience with the G-Branch endograft appears safe and yields high technical success with encouraging short-term outcomes for the endovascular repair of J/PAAA and TAAA. Continued patient surveillance and extended follow-up are essential to confirm these results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Youssef et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and juxta/pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (J/PAAA) (n=50). Customized G-Branch endograft was evaluated on Technical success. Treatment of thoraco-abdominal and juxta/pararenal aortic aneurysms with the customized G-Branch endograft achieved a 96% technical success rate and 4% in-hospital mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: