Key result
Reperfusion therapies for acute pulmonary embolism resulted in a significantly greater absolute reduction in vascular obstructive index (45% vs 26%) and improved right ventricular function compared to anticoagulation alone.
Why the study?
Although reperfusion strategies have improved short-term outcomes in pulmonary embolism, up to 50% of patients report persistent dyspnea, leaving the impact on clot resolution and long-term outcomes compared with anticoagulation alone unclear.
Do reperfusion therapies improve clot resolution and long-term outcomes compared to anticoagulation alone in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Population
382 acute PE registry patients with repeat imaging at 3 to 12 months
Comparison
Reperfusion therapies followed by anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone
Design
Single-center retrospective registry study
Follow-up
12 months
Authors
Loading...
Reperfusion therapies were associated with greater clot resolution in acute PE; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Observational (n=382)
No
Do reperfusion therapies improve clot resolution and long-term outcomes compared to anticoagulation alone in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Absolute Event Rate: 21% vs 9%
p-value: p=0.001
In patients with acute pulmonary embolism, reperfusion therapies were associated with greater clot resolution, improved right ventricular function, and lower 12-month mortality compared to anticoagulation alone.
Lio et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Acute pulmonary embolism (n=382). Reperfusion therapies vs. Anticoagulation alone was evaluated on Incidence of residual pulmonary vascular obstruction (RPVO) (p=0.001). Reperfusion therapies for acute pulmonary embolism resulted in a significantly greater absolute reduction in vascular obstructive index (45% vs 26%) and improved right ventricular function compared to anticoagulation alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: