Studies of the rate of clearance of a gellan gum formulation (Gelrite) radiolabelled by the inclusion of technetium-99m labelled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid were carried out in volunteer subjects and in rabbits. Disposition was followed by gamma scintigraphy and compared with 0.5% w/v hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) solution and isotonic saline administered to the same subjects. Clearance of all solutions was found to follow bi-exponential kinetics with differences in clearance rates between the two species studied. A significant retention of the gellan gum formulation compared to HEC (p = 0.006) or saline (p = 0.009) was noted in man, but not in the rabbit. In this latter species the HEC showed greater retention compared to Gelrite. The species-specific differences in the precorneal residence of the formulations are attributed to the different physiological responses following instillation of solutions into the eye.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greaves et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: