OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of comorbidity in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treated or not with low-dose glucocorticoids (GC) and who have been followed for at least 10 years. METHODS: This was a retrospective study by review of medical records. RESULTS: We identified 365 patients: 297 (81.3%) were GC users (4-6 mg methylprednisolone daily) and 68 (18.7%) were nonusers. We found that fragility fractures occurred in 18.2% of GC users and in 6.0% of GC nonusers (p < 0.02); arterial hypertension in 32.3% of GC users and in 10.4% of GC nonusers (p < 0.0005); acute myocardial infarction in 13.1% of GC users and in 1.5% of the nonusers (p < 0.01). Prevalence of diabetes mellitus, cataract, and infections was comparable. We divided GC users into groups of different duration of GC therapy: < 2, 2-5, and > 5 years; the mean duration of GC treatment was 1.3 ± 0.5, 3.6 ± 1.1, and 12.1 ± 5.1 years, respectively. GC treatment for > 5 years was associated with significantly higher prevalence of fragility fractures (26.6%; p < 0.001 vs the other groups), arterial hypertension (36.7%; p < 0.0002 vs nonusers and GC users < 2 years), myocardial infarction (16.1%; p < 0.01 vs nonusers), and infections (9.7%; p < 0.005 vs the other groups). GC treatment for 2-5 years was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (30.0%; p < 0.01) compared to nonusers. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA treated with low-dose GC compared to patients never treated with GC show a higher prevalence of fractures, arterial hypertension, myocardial infarction, and serious infections, especially after 5 years of GC treatment. The high prevalence of myocardial infarction and fractures in patients with RA suggests that a more accurate identification of risk factors and prevention measures should be adopted when longterm GC treatment is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazzantini et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: