Key result
Single axillary cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection was associated with shorter cardiopulmonary bypass duration (229 vs 244) and similar in-hospital mortality (7% vs 14%, p=0.071).
Why the study?
Acute type A aortic dissection is a cardiovascular emergency with high mortality and morbidity, prompting a comparison of single versus double arterial cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass.
Does single arterial cannulation via axillary artery improve outcomes compared to double arterial cannulation in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for acute type A aortic dissection?
Observational (n=429)
No
Does single arterial cannulation via axillary artery improve outcomes compared to double arterial cannulation in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for acute type A aortic dissection?
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 14%
p-value: p=0.071
Single axillary cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection surgery reduces cardiopulmonary bypass time, cross-clamp time, and hospital length of stay compared to double cannulation, without significantly affecting mortality.
May shorten bypass time with similar mortality; leaves open survival benefit pending randomized trials.
Background: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a cardiovascular emergency and has high mortality and morbidity. We retrospectively compared the effects on outcomes of single arterial cannulation via axillary artery (AAC) with double arterial cannulation via axillary and femoral artery (DAC) in patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for ATAAD. Methods: Between January 2017 and May 2021, four hundred 29 patients who underwent aortic arch repair with circulatory arrest for ATAAD were divided into AAC group ( n = 283) and DAC group ( n = 146). The propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis were performed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of the groups. Results: After PSM ( n = 137 in each), the DAC group had a longer duration of CPB (229 vs 244, p = 0.011), aortic cross-clamp time (121 vs 149, p < 0.001), durations of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay (7 vs 8, p = 0.014) and hospital stay (19 vs 25, p < 0.001) compared with AAC group. The incidences of dialysis (21% vs. 31%, p = 0.073), postoperative stroke (9% vs 15%, p = 0.143), ECMO support (2% vs 7%, p = 0.077), in-hospital mortality (7% vs 14%, p = 0.071) and follow-up mortality (10% vs 19%, p = 0.059) showed no significant difference between two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed postoperative ECMO (OR: 16.69, 95% CI: 1.78–156.29; p = 0.014) or stroke (OR: 11.34, 95% CI: 2.64–48.72; p < 0.001) were associated with in-hospital mortality. Univariate Cox regression results showed stroke history (OR: 4.61, 95% CI: 1.90–11.16; p = 0.001), aortic valvuloplasty (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07–0.59; p = 0.003), postoperative ALT day1 (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00–1.00; p = 0.008), ECMO (OR: 16.30, 95% CI: 4.78–55.61; p < 0.001), tracheotomy (OR: 3.78, 95% CI: 1.08–13.20; p = 0.037), postoperative stroke (OR: 4.61, 95% CI: 1.90–11.16; p < 0.001) and re-exploration for bleeding (OR: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.01–12.27; p = 0.048) were associated to follow-up mortality. Conclusions: For surgical treatment of ATAAD with CPB when compared to double axillary and femoral artery, single axillary cannulation was associated with shorter durations of CPB and ACC as well as ICU and hospital stays but no with significant difference in mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) (n=429). Single arterial cannulation via axillary artery (AAC) vs. Double arterial cannulation via axillary and femoral artery (DAC) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.071). Single axillary cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection was associated with shorter cardiopulmonary bypass duration (229 vs 244) and similar in-hospital mortality (7% vs 14%, p=0.071).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: