Key result
Oncolytic viruses can be genetically modified to enhance tumor-specific destruction while navigating the complex role of the host immune response.
This review summarizes the mechanisms, immune interactions, and clinical status of genetically modified oncolytic viruses as anticancer agents.
Should not yet change oncology practice; hypothesis-generating for immune-optimized oncolytic virus strategies.
The concept of using replicating viruses as anticancer agents is not a new one, but the ability to genetically modify these viruses into increasingly potent and tumor-specific vectors is a recent phenomenon. As more is learned about the functions of viral gene products in controlling the mammalian cell cycle and in disabling cellular defense mechanisms, specific viral functions can be augmented or eliminated to enhance antineoplastic efficacy. In this article, general mechanisms by which oncolytic viruses achieve their antitumor efficacy and specificity are reviewed. The paradoxical roles of the immune response are addressed with respect to oncolytic viral therapy, as it, on one hand, impedes the spread of viral infection, and on the other, augments tumor cell destruction through the recruitment of T cells "vaccinated" against tumor antigens. The most commonly used oncolytic viruses are each reviewed in turn, including adenoviruses, herpes simplex viruses, vaccinia viruses, reoviruses, and Newcastle disease viruses. Special attention is focused on the unique biology of each of these viruses as well as the status of several of these mutants in clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mullen et al. (2002) conducted a review in Cancer. Oncolytic viruses was evaluated. Oncolytic viruses can be genetically modified to enhance tumor-specific destruction while navigating the complex role of the host immune response.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: