Key result
FbEVAR after previous open versus endovascular aortic repair showed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality or technical success.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients treated with fbEVAR for pAAA and TAAA after previous open versus previous endovascular abdominal aortic repair.
Does fenestrated and branched stent grafting (fbEVAR) have different perioperative outcomes in patients with previous open versus previous endovascular abdominal aortic repair?
Cohort (n=42)
No
Does fenestrated and branched stent grafting (fbEVAR) have different perioperative outcomes in patients with previous open versus previous endovascular abdominal aortic repair?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fenestrated and branched stent grafting for pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms is feasible and safe with comparable technical success and in-hospital mortality regardless of whether the prior repair was open or endovascular.
BACKGROUND: To compare the perioperative outcome of patients treated with elective or urgent fenestrated and branched stent grafting (fbEVAR) for pararenal (pAAA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) after previous open with previous endovascular abdominal aortic repair. METHODS: Single center retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing fbEVAR after previous open (post-open fbEVAR group) or endovascular abdominal aortic repair (post-endo fbEVAR group) between January 2015 and December 2017. Primary outcomes were technical success and in-hospital all-cause mortality. RESULTS: We identified 42 patients undergoing fbEVAR after previous open or endovascular abdominal aortic repair during this period. Twenty-one patients (post-open fbEVAR group) had previous open abdominal aortic repair, 13 with a bifurcated and 8 with a tube graft. Of these, 2 patients presented with pAAA and 19 with TAAA. Twenty-one patients (post-endo fbEVAR group) had previous EVAR. Thirteen patients presented with pAAA, 3 of them with additional type Ia endoleak, 2 with stent-graft migration and 2 with previously failed fEVAR. Eight presented with TAAA. Median interval between previous repair and fbEVAR was 84 months (IQR 60-156) for the post-open fbEVAR group and 72 months (IQR 36-96) for the post-endo fbEVAR group (P = 0.746). Eighteen patients (86%) had branched stent grafting in the post-open versus 11 (52%) in the post-endo group (P < 0.01). In 2 patients in the post-open group, 3 renal arteries were not catheterized due to severe ostial stenosis, resulting in technical success of 91% in the post-open and 100% in the post-endo fbEVAR group. Four patients (19%) in the post-open fbEVAR group died in hospital, 2 due to cerebral hemorrhage and 2 due to pneumonia, and none in the post-endo fbEVAR group (P = 0.101). There were 5 nonstent-graft-related reinterventions, 2 (10%) in the post-open fbEVAR group and 3 (14%) in the post-endo fbEVAR group (P = 0.844). After 12 months there were 4 events in the post-endo fbEVAR group: one renal artery stent occluded, one renal artery stent required relining because of disconnection and 2 type II endoleaks were embolized with coils. There were no reinterventions in the post-open fbEVAR group during 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Fenestrated and branched repair after previous open or endovascular abdominal aortic repair appears safe with high technical success rate. There is no difference in the technical success and in-hospital all-cause mortality rates between fbEVAR after previous open or endovascular abdominal aortic repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makaloski et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (n=42). fbEVAR after previous open abdominal aortic repair vs. fbEVAR after previous endovascular abdominal aortic repair was evaluated on in-hospital all-cause mortality (p=0.101). FbEVAR after previous open versus endovascular aortic repair showed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality or technical success.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: