Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To study the safety and efficacy of hydroxyethylrutosides (HR) in patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) (Widmer grade II) and examine any correlation with objective measurements (plethysmography and Tc P o 2 ). Design: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Setting: One outpatient university angiology clinic, one outpatient angiology clinic in a military hospital and one private angiological consultation, all in the Paris area. Patients: One hundred and nine patients with grade II Widmer CVI, confirmed by echo-Doppler and plethysmography. Elastic stockings were excluded. After five exclusions, 53 received HR and 51 placebo. Interventions: Patients randomized to one sachet of 1 g HR twice daily (or placebo) for 2 months, after a 1 month placebo run-in period. Examinations on entry to the trial (T –1 ), after 1 month run-in (T –0 ) and after 1 (T +1 ) and 2 months (T +2 ) treatment. Main outcome measures: These were measured at each of the four visits. Primary outcome: minimal ankle and maximal calf circumferences. Secondary outcomes: five individual leg symptoms and total symptom score, pitting oedema. Plethysmography (six calculated variables) and Tc P o 2 . Results: The reduction of both ankle and calf circumferences was significantly greater in the HR group ( p <0.0001), as was pitting oedema ( p <0.001), the five individual symptoms and the total symptom score ( p <0.001). Of the plethysmographic findings, there was a significant reduction in maximum venous outflow ( p <0.001 at T +1 and p <0.05 at T +2 ). Overall there was no significant change in Tc P o 2 . Conclusions: HR is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for leg oedema and symptoms of patients with CVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cloarec et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: