Key result
Re-engineering the preoperative pathway through early patient engagement, collaborative decision-making, and behavioral change can improve surgical care and add value.
Re-engineering the preoperative pathway to engage patients earlier allows for collaborative decision-making, behavioral change, and targeted comorbidity management to improve surgical outcomes.
May support preoperative pathway optimization; leaves open confirmation in prospective trials before practice change.
The case for radical pathway re-design before surgery is in part driven by healthcare system pressures which are in turn the result of continuously rising demand in the face of tightly constrained resources. Such circumstances tend to drive revolutionary, rather than incremental, change. The current approach to preoperative assessment, that typically occurs in the weeks leading up to surgery, but is all too often only a few days before surgery, results in a lost opportunity for perioperative physicians to improve patient care. Re-engineering this process based on a patient-focused, pathway-driven vision of perioperative medicine offers a means of exploiting this opportunity. This review explores drivers for change, the opportunity offered by pathway re-design, and suggests a variety of strategies to add value in the preoperative pathway, each of which is facilitated by early engagement between perioperative physician and patient: collaborative decision-making, collaborative behavioural change, targeted comorbidity management as well as expectation management and psychological preparation for surgery including surgery schools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grocott et al. (2017) conducted a review in Perioperative care. Preoperative pathway re-design vs. Traditional preoperative assessment was evaluated. Re-engineering the preoperative pathway through early patient engagement, collaborative decision-making, and behavioral change can improve surgical care and add value.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: