Differences between Coronary Hyperresponsiveness to Ergonovine and Vasospastic Angina.

The objective of the present study was to investigate the differences between coronary hyperresponsiveness without ischemia and vasospastic angina in an ergonovine provocation test using multivariate analysis. We have sometimes experienced a more than 50% narrowing response of vascular diameter without ischemia in a coronary response to ergonovine. We studied 107 patients with less than 50% stenosis in a coronary arteriogram. Their vascular responses to ergonovine were measured and the patients were divided into three groups, as follows: Group 1 had 50% or less vascular narrowing response without ischemia; Group 2 had a vascular hyperresponsiveness of more than 50% narrowing response without ischemia; and Group 3 experienced a hyperresponsiveness with ischemia. The degree of coronary response was found to be related to smoking, inpaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and the Gensini score by multiple regression analysis. A multiple logistic analysis revealed that the Gensini score and smoking were significant predictive factors for Group 3 (odds ratio: 1.20 and 8.97). The only factor different between Group 2 and Group 1 was gender. The coronary hyperresponsiveness to ergonovine without ischemia differs from vasospastic angina in the degree of coronary atherosclerosis and smoking habits. The patients with hyperresponsiveness had similar characteristics to those with atypical chest pain rather than vasospastic angina, except for a gender difference.