Key result
Ergonovine-induced coronary vasoconstriction at the angioplasty segment was significantly greater in patients with previous myocardial infarction compared to those with stable angina (P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does coronary vasoreactivity to ergonovine differ between infarct-related and noninfarct-related coronary arteries 1 year after PTCA?
Observational (n=38)
Does coronary vasoreactivity to ergonovine differ between infarct-related and noninfarct-related coronary arteries 1 year after PTCA?
p-value: p=<0.01
The constrictor response to ergonovine is significantly enhanced in infarct-related coronary arteries compared to noninfarct-related arteries 1 year after angioplasty, suggesting persistent smooth muscle hypersensitivity.
Background: The vasoreactivity after direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with previous myocardial infarction remains unknown. We examined the constrictor responce to ergonovine of the infarct-related coronary artery in comparison with that of noninfarct-related coronary artery after angioplasty. Methods: Ergonovine was administered intravenously to 17 patients with previous myocardial infarction (group I) and to 21 patients with stable angina (group II) 1 year after PTCA. The effects of ergonovine on lumen diameter were analysed quantitatively at the PTCA segment, nonPTCA segment (proximal to the PTCA segment), and nonPTCA artery. Results: The ergonovine-induced decrease in minimal lumen diameter at the PTCA segment was significant in group I (decrease from 2.12 ± 0.56 to 1.39 ± 0.74 mm, P < 0.01), but not in group II (decrease from 1.60 ± 0.35 to 1.43 ± 0.33 mm, NS). Patients in group I showed a constrictor response at the nonPTCA artery (decrease in diameter from 2.54 ± 0.90 to 1.94 ± 0.77 mm, P < 0.01), and a tendency to constrict at the nonPTCA segment (2.56 ± 0.67 to 2.11 ± 0.66 mm, P = 0.06), whereas those in group II showed no significant constrictor response to ergonovine at any of the three segments examined. The changes in diameter at the three segments in patients in group I were significantly greater than those in group II (all P < 0.01). Subtotal coronary spasm at the PTCA segment was provoked only in three patients in group I (18%). Conclusions: The constrictor response to ergonovine of the infarct-related coronary artery was enhanced compared with that of the noninfarct-related coronary artery. This difference in coronary vasoreactivity at the angioplasty segment may be due to previous hypersensitivity of the smooth muscle. Coronary Artery Dis 9:105-111 1988 Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshitomi et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Previous myocardial infarction or stable angina post-PTCA (n=38). Previous myocardial infarction vs. Stable angina was evaluated on Change in minimal lumen diameter at the PTCA segment after ergonovine administration (p=<0.01). Ergonovine-induced coronary vasoconstriction at the angioplasty segment was significantly greater in patients with previous myocardial infarction compared to those with stable angina (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: