Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is shown that the procedure of Klemm and Clem (abbreviated as I) for the transformation to isotropic form of the Ginzburg-Landau free energy for a superconductor with a general effectivemass anisotropy leads to a current which is not perpendicular to the magnetic induction B, unless B is in a crystal-symmetry direction. In general, the mean-field free energy is thus a function of a new parameter β, which depends upon the direction cosines of B, as well as a function of the renormalized ̃ \~κ parameter of I, except at the upper critical field Hc2. A perturbation solution in γ=β(1+β) is found to order γ², and the angular dependence of the lower critical field Hc1 is determined. The parameter β is found to cause B to nearly lock on to a crystal-symmetry direction, so that as the external field angle is varied, B switches from near to one symmetry direction to (near to) another, yielding a kink in the angular dependence of Hc1 that is more pronounced than in I.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard A. Klemm (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: