Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The structurally related POU homeo domain proteins Pit-1 and Oct-2 activate pituitary- and lymphoid-specific transcription, respectively, by binding to similar AT-rich motifs in their target genes. In this study we identify bases critical for recognition and activation by Pit-1 and examine how small differences in Pit-1 and Oct-2-binding sites can impart differential transcriptional responses in pituitary and B-lymphoid cells. Scanning mutagenesis of Pit-1 response elements in both the rat prolactin and growth hormone genes reveals a critical binding motif recognized in an identical manner by the native Pit-1 protein and cloned Pit-1 gene product. This motif, ATTATTCCAT, differs by only two bases from the octamer element, ATTTGCAT, required for Oct-2-dependent activation of immunoglobulin genes. Cross recognition of Pit-1 and Oct-2 sites by both factors can be demonstrated in competitive binding assays, in which an oligometric Pit-1 site from the prolactin gene is converted to an Oct-2 site by a double point mutation. In contrast to the binding data, no cross activation of transcription is detectable in cultured cell lines. When inserted immediately 5' to a prolactin TATA box, the wild-type prolactin element enhances transcription strongly in pituitary cells but is inactive in B cells, whereas the octamer variant of the prolactin site activates expression in B cells but is silent in pituitary lines. Both elements are nonfunctional in heterologous cell lines that lack Pit-1 and Oct-2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elsholtz et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: