Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diamond anvil cell (DAC), synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD), and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) techniques are used to probe the composition inside hollow γ-Fe(3)O(4) nanoparticles (NPs). SAXS experiments on 5.2, 13.3, and 13.8 nm hollow-shell γ-Fe(3)O(4) NPs, and 6 nm core/14.8 nm hollow-shell Au/Fe(3)O(4) NPs, reveal the significantly high (higher than solvent) electron density of the void inside the hollow shell. In high-pressure DAC experiments using Ne as pressure-transmitting medium, formation of nanocrystalline Ne inside hollow NPs is not detected by XRD, indicating that the oxide shell is impenetrable. Also, FTIR analysis on solutions of hollow-shell γ-Fe(3)O(4) NPs fragmented upon refluxing shows no evidence of organic molecules from the void inside, excluding the possibility that organic molecules get through the iron oxide shell during synthesis. High-pressure DAC experiments on Au/Fe(3)O(4) core/hollow-shell NPs show good transmittance of the external pressure to the gold core, indicating the presence of the pressure-transmitting medium in the gap between the core and the hollow shell. Overall, our data reveal the presence of most likely small fragments of iron and/or iron oxide in the void of the hollow NPs. The iron oxide shell seems to be non-porous and impenetrable by gases and liquids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Podsiadlo et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: