Why the study?
Does abdominal fetal electrocardiography accurately measure short and long term fetal heart rate variability compared to direct fetal electrocardiography in patients in early labour?
Does abdominal fetal electrocardiography accurately measure short and long term fetal heart rate variability compared to direct fetal electrocardiography in patients in early labour?
Abdominal fetal electrocardiography provides reliable information to judge fetal heart rate variability antenatally and intrapartum, with high correlation to direct fetal electrocardiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
aFECG may support noninvasive fetal HRV assessment in early labor; leaves open prospective outcome validation before clinical adoption.
The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of the abdominal fetal electrocardiography (aFECG), and compare the short term and long term variability registered by this method with the direct fetal electrocardiography (dFECG). With three cardiotocographs the aFECG, the dFECG and the maternal ECG were registered simultaneously and stored on a magnetic tape. After analogue-digital conversion, the information was calculated in a computer system. The variability registered by aFECG and dFECG was compared allowing a difference of both one beat and two beats/min. From nine patients in early labour 30651 heart beats were registered by dFECG. By aFECg 27720 beats were registered. Within a window of +/- 10 ms 98.5% of all pulses registered by aFECG were found. The correlation coefficients for short term variability were 0.75 and 0.91. For long term variability the correlation coefficients were 0.94 and 0.98. To allow calculations of the short term variability the registration of the instantaneous fetal heart rate is necessary. In the antenatal period only indirect methods for electrocardiography are possible. The present report shows that with the abdominal electrocardiography the short term and long term variability can be judged. the quality of the registrations is good enough to allow computer calculations of the information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solum et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: