Key result
Increasing heart rate via atrial pacing led to a deterioration in left ventricular global longitudinal strain in 76% of patients, while right ventricular global longitudinal strain improved in 47%.
Why the study?
Although speckle tracking echocardiography is relevant for evaluating ventricular function, the effect of heart rate variations on left and right ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with and without chronic heart failure required analysis.
Does increasing heart rate via atrial stimulation alter left and right ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with and without chronic heart failure?
Does increasing heart rate via atrial stimulation alter left and right ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with and without chronic heart failure?
Increasing heart rate elicits heterogeneous ventricular responses, typically worsening left ventricular longitudinal strain while improving right ventricular strain in patients with and without chronic heart failure.
Alerts to potential LV strain worsening with higher rates during pacing; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Over the past years, a number of studies have demonstrated the relevance of strain assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in evaluating ventricular function. The aim of this study was to analyze changes in left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) longitudinal strain associated with variations of heart rate (HR) in participants with and without chronic heart failure (CHF). We enrolled 45 patients, 38 of these diagnosed with CHF and carrying an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and seven patients with pacemakers and without CHF. The frequency of atrial stimulation was increased to 90 beats/min and an echocardiogram was performed at each increase of 10 beats/min. Global LV and RV longitudinal strain (LVGLS and RVGLS, respectively) and RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVfwLS) were calculated at each HR. When analyzed as continuous variables, significant reductions in LVGLS were detected at higher HRs, whereas improvements in both RVGLS and RVfwLS were observed. Patients with a worsening of LVGLS (76% overall) were more likely to present lower baseline LV function. Only a few patients (18% for RVGLS and 16% for RVfwLS) exhibited HR-related deteriorations of RV strain measures, which was associated with lower levels of baseline RV function and higher pulmonary systolic pressures. Finally, 21 (47%) and 25 (56%) participants responded with improvements in RVGLS and RVfwLS, respectively. Our findings revealed heterogeneous RV and LV responses to increases in HR. These findings might ultimately be used to optimize cardiac functionality in patients diagnosed with CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terlizzi et al. (2022) studied Chronic Heart Failure (n=45). Increased heart rate via atrial pacing vs. Baseline heart rate was evaluated on Changes in left (LVGLS) and right ventricular (RVGLS) global longitudinal strain. Increasing heart rate via atrial pacing led to a deterioration in left ventricular global longitudinal strain in 76% of patients, while right ventricular global longitudinal strain improved in 47%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: