Key result
In HIV-1-infected individuals with advanced immunosuppression, CMV-QFT reactivity was associated with a significantly lower proportion of patients displaying CMV DNAemia > 100 copies/mL compared to non-reactive patients (23% vs. 48%, P = 0.02).
Why the study?
Does CMV-specific T cell-mediated immunity assessment by CMV-QFT predict CMV DNAemia in HIV-1-infected individuals with CD4+ T cell count < 350/μL?
Cohort (n=153)
No
Does CMV-specific T cell-mediated immunity assessment by CMV-QFT predict CMV DNAemia in HIV-1-infected individuals with CD4+ T cell count < 350/μL?
Absolute Event Rate: 23% vs 48%
p-value: p=0.02
CMV-QFT reactivity is associated with lower rates of CMV DNAemia in HIV-1-infected individuals, but indeterminate results due to low CD4+ counts limit its clinical utility.
May aid CMV risk stratification in advanced HIV; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Among HIV-1-infected individuals, cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and disease occur in the setting of advanced immunosuppression. The value of a standardized assessment of CMV-specific T-cell mediated immunity by the CMV QuantiFERON assay (CMV-QFT) has not yet been thoroughly investigated in HIV-1-infected subjects. METHODS: Prospective, longitudinal study in 153 HIV-1-infected subjects with a CD4+ T cell count < 350/μL who simultaneously underwent CMV-QFT, CMV serology testing and CMV-DNA quantification. Factors associated with CMV-QFT were evaluated. Clinical screening for CMV manifestations was then performed every 3 months. RESULTS: Among the 141 CMV IgG-seropositive individuals the CMV-QFT assay yielded reactive results in 84% (118/141), negative results in 15% (21/141) and indeterminate (negative mitogen IFN-gamma response) results in 1% (2/141) of subjects. The mean actual CD4+ T cell count was significantly higher in CMV-QFT reactive subjects, when compared to CMV-QFT non-reactive individuals (183 ± 102 vs. 126 ± 104 cells/μL, P = 0.015). A significantly lower proportion of CMV-QFT reactive vs. non-reactive patients displayed CMV DNAemia > 100 copies/mL (23% (27/118) vs. 48% (11/23), P = 0.02). Furthermore, a statistically significant inverse association between mitogen IFN-gamma response and CMV-DNAemia > 1000 copies/mL was observed (P < 0.001). During the observational period, 5 CMV end-organ manifestations were observed. In three of the CMV cases the CMV-QFT yielded indeterminate results. CONCLUSIONS: While CMV-QFT reactivity indicates CMV-specific immunity, indeterminate results due to negative mitogen IFN-gamma response might reflect HIV-1-induced immunodeficiency. Thus, dependency upon CD4+ T cell count should be considered when interpreting CMV-QFT results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aichelburg et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in HIV-1 infection with advanced immunosuppression (n=153). CMV-QFT reactivity vs. CMV-QFT non-reactivity was evaluated on CMV DNAemia > 100 copies/mL (p=0.02). In HIV-1-infected individuals with advanced immunosuppression, CMV-QFT reactivity was associated with a significantly lower proportion of patients displaying CMV DNAemia > 100 copies/mL compared to non-reactive patients (23% vs. 48%, P = 0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: